Showing posts with label Reasoning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reasoning. Show all posts

SBI-PO 2008 (Reasoning)

Sunday, 5 June 2011


  STATE BANK OF INDIA PO EXAMINATION - 2008


Reasoning Ability

 

1. In a Cretan code BOARD is written as 53169 and NEAR is written as 2416. How is NODE written in that code.
(a) 2394    (b) 2894
(c) 2934    (d)2694
(e) these
Ans. (a)
B O A R D N E A R
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
5 3 1 6 9 2 4 1 6
Therefore,
N O D E
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
2 3 9 4



  STATE BANK OF INDIA PO EXAMINATION - 2008


Reasoning Ability

 

1. In a Cretan code BOARD is written as 53169 and NEAR is written as 2416. How is NODE written in that code.
(a) 2394    (b) 2894
(c) 2934    (d)2694
(e) these
Ans. (a)
B O A R D N E A R
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
5 3 1 6 9 2 4 1 6
Therefore,
N O D E
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
2 3 9 4


Read more ...

SBI-PO 2007 (REASONING)


SBI-PO 2007 (REASONING)


Directions (1-5): In.the questions given below,, certain symbols are used with the following  meaning:
A @ B means A is greater than B.
A * B means A is either greater than or equal to B.
A # B means A is equal to B.
A $ B means A is either smaller than or equal to B.
A + B means A is smaller than B"
Now in each of the following questions assuming the given
statements to be true, find which of the . to conclusions I and II
given below them is/are definitely True?
Give answer (a) if only conclusion I is true
Give answer (b) if only conclusion II is true.
Give answer (c) if either conclusion I or II is true.
Give answer (d) if neither conclusion I nor II is true.
. Give answer (e) if both conclusions I and I I are true.
(1-5) @ ⇒ > * ⇒ ≥ # ⇒ =
# ⇒ ≤ + ⇒ <


SBI-PO 2007 (REASONING)


Directions (1-5): In.the questions given below,, certain symbols are used with the following  meaning:
A @ B means A is greater than B.
A * B means A is either greater than or equal to B.
A # B means A is equal to B.
A $ B means A is either smaller than or equal to B.
A + B means A is smaller than B"
Now in each of the following questions assuming the given
statements to be true, find which of the . to conclusions I and II
given below them is/are definitely True?
Give answer (a) if only conclusion I is true
Give answer (b) if only conclusion II is true.
Give answer (c) if either conclusion I or II is true.
Give answer (d) if neither conclusion I nor II is true.
. Give answer (e) if both conclusions I and I I are true.
(1-5) @ ⇒ > * ⇒ ≥ # ⇒ =
# ⇒ ≤ + ⇒ <

Read more ...

STATE BANK OF INDIA PO 2006(REASONING)


 STATE BANK OF INDIA PO 2006(REASONING)

 

Directions (1-5): Study the following information to answer these questions.
1. Seven persons P, Q, R, S, T, V X belonging to different cities viz. Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata' Bangalore' Hyderabad and Trivandrum, not necessarily in the same order' went to USA for attending a Conference. Each one had a different specialisation viz. Literature, Physics, Economics, Marketing' Computers Textile Engineering and lnformation Technology.
II. 'S' is from Chennai and'Q' does not have specialisation in Textile or Economics. R is a man of Marketing and comes from Mumbai. The person from Kolkata has specialisation in Computers. 'P' who is specialised in Literature does not belong to Delhi. V having specialisation in Physics is from Trivandrum' Information Technology is the specialisation of X who comes from Bangalore.
Person City Specialisation
P Hyderabad Literature
Q Calcutta Computers
R Mumbai Marketing
S Chennai Texile/Economics
T Delhi Texile/Economics
V Trivandrum Physics
X Bangalore Information Technology


 STATE BANK OF INDIA PO 2006(REASONING)

 

Directions (1-5): Study the following information to answer these questions.
1. Seven persons P, Q, R, S, T, V X belonging to different cities viz. Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata' Bangalore' Hyderabad and Trivandrum, not necessarily in the same order' went to USA for attending a Conference. Each one had a different specialisation viz. Literature, Physics, Economics, Marketing' Computers Textile Engineering and lnformation Technology.
II. 'S' is from Chennai and'Q' does not have specialisation in Textile or Economics. R is a man of Marketing and comes from Mumbai. The person from Kolkata has specialisation in Computers. 'P' who is specialised in Literature does not belong to Delhi. V having specialisation in Physics is from Trivandrum' Information Technology is the specialisation of X who comes from Bangalore.
Person City Specialisation
P Hyderabad Literature
Q Calcutta Computers
R Mumbai Marketing
S Chennai Texile/Economics
T Delhi Texile/Economics
V Trivandrum Physics
X Bangalore Information Technology

Read more ...

SBI-PO 2005 (Reasoning)


SBI-PO 2005 (Reasoning)


Directions (1-5) In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by four conclusions numbered` I, II, III and IV You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

1. Statements : All trains are rivers. Some rivers are houses.
All houses are lakes.
Conclusions:
I. Some lakes are trains.
Il. Some houses are trains.
III. No train is lake.
IV. Some houses are rivers.
(a) None follows
(b) Only IV follows
(c) Only either I or III follows
(d) Only either I or III and IV follow
(e) All follow
(d) Ans : First and third Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type). Second Premises Particular Affirmative (I-type) Some rivers are houses.
All houses are lakes We know that, I A ⇒ I-type
Conclusion I and III from complementary pair. Therefore, either I or III follows.
Conclusion IV is converse of the second Premise.



SBI-PO 2005 (Reasoning)


Directions (1-5) In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by four conclusions numbered` I, II, III and IV You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

1. Statements : All trains are rivers. Some rivers are houses.
All houses are lakes.
Conclusions:
I. Some lakes are trains.
Il. Some houses are trains.
III. No train is lake.
IV. Some houses are rivers.
(a) None follows
(b) Only IV follows
(c) Only either I or III follows
(d) Only either I or III and IV follow
(e) All follow
(d) Ans : First and third Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type). Second Premises Particular Affirmative (I-type) Some rivers are houses.
All houses are lakes We know that, I A ⇒ I-type
Conclusion I and III from complementary pair. Therefore, either I or III follows.
Conclusion IV is converse of the second Premise.


Read more ...

 
 
 

Followers

 
Blogger Widgets